Discovery
We identify the product, intended audience and claims that deserve verification.
Testing protocol
How we test digital tools
Our reviews separate verified facts, hands-on observations, editorial judgment and commercial information.
Methodology
A repeatable evidence workflow
Research
Official documentation, terms, pricing and commercial disclosures are logged.
Hands-on test
Core workflows are tested in a declared browser, platform and plan.
Evidence review
Claims are connected to screenshots, recordings, policies or test notes.
Scoring
The Editorial Score is calculated only after the supporting record is documented.
Update cycle
Published reviews receive dated checks and visible pending-test notices.
Score protection
No number without a record
A numerical score must be supported by documented criteria. When critical testing is incomplete, the review clearly labels the score as provisional and lists what remains pending. Access limits are recorded rather than treated as universal product behavior.
Six dimensions
What the score considers
Evaluated with product-specific evidence and editorial context.
Evaluated with product-specific evidence and editorial context.
Evaluated with product-specific evidence and editorial context.
Evaluated with product-specific evidence and editorial context.
Evaluated with product-specific evidence and editorial context.
Evaluated with product-specific evidence and editorial context.
Reader context
Testing is honest about limits.
Not every product receives identical hands-on coverage. A free plan, unavailable feature, device difference or privacy decision can limit what we observe. Reviews identify those boundaries so readers can distinguish an observed result from an official claim or an editorial assessment.